Parinita Corridor
The Sovereign Highway
SD-WAN data plane with sub-50ms failover across every carrier.
Corridor is the SD-WAN data plane that owns WAN path selection. Where Crucible decides what is allowed and encodes identity into the packet, Corridor decides how the packet moves — scoring every available WAN path in real time on latency, health, cost, and sovereignty.
BGP Convergence Is Too Slow for Regulated AI Workloads
BGP failover takes 30 seconds to 15 minutes. For AI inference workloads carrying ITAR or HIPAA data, that window is unacceptable. Manual path policy in routing tables cannot enforce data-sovereignty constraints in real time.
Enterprises with multi-jurisdiction workloads write compliance logic into application code because the network layer cannot enforce residency. Carrier failures cascade because path selection has no real-time health awareness.
-
BGP Convergence Latency
BGP failover takes 30 seconds to 15 minutes. Regulated AI inference workloads cannot tolerate that window.
-
No Sovereignty Enforcement at the Network Layer
Application code must enforce data residency because network policy cannot. One misconfiguration sends regulated data across a non-compliant path.
-
Carrier Dependency Risk
Single-carrier WAN creates hard dependencies. No path-scoring engine means carrier degradation becomes an outage, not a reroute.
Four-dimensional path scoring. Sub-50ms failover.
Corridor does not replace your WAN providers. It arbitrates intelligently across all of them — scoring every path in real time on latency, health, cost, and sovereignty constraints, and failing closed when no compliant path exists.
BFD probes (10ms x 5 multiplier) and active probes (100ms cadence) feed a real-time scorer on every path. NATS JetStream events propagate health changes to the scorer in under 10ms. Failover is sub-50ms.
-
Four-Dimensional Path Scoring
BFD probes (10ms x 5) plus active probes (100ms cadence) feed a real-time scorer on latency, health, cost, and sovereignty. Decisions in under 10ms.
-
Sub-50ms Failover
NATS JetStream events deliver health changes to the scorer in under 10ms. New path selected and enforced in under 50ms — vs. BGP's 30 seconds to 15 minutes.
-
Every Major WAN Provider
Lumen (primary), Megaport (dynamic cross-connect), AWS Direct Connect, GCP Cloud Interconnect, Azure ExpressRoute, plus mobile/broadband carrier peering — all through one control plane.
-
Sovereignty-Hard, Fail-Closed
HIPAA, ITAR, and Financial workloads disqualify public Lumen paths automatically. If no compliant path exists, the request is rejected. Corridor fails closed rather than open.
-
Anycast Bootstrap
Corridor selects the nearest POP via anycast. After POP selection, hands off to Crucible for tunnel establishment and identity assignment.
-
Megaport Dynamic Cross-Connect
Corridor manages the Megaport API for programmatic cross-connect provisioning — dynamic SD-WAN paths across Megaport's fabric without manual provisioning.
-
Hyperscaler Interconnects
AWS Direct Connect, GCP Cloud Interconnect, and Azure ExpressRoute treated as dynamic SD-WAN paths — health-scored like any other WAN option.
-
SLA Breach Escalation
SLA breaches for regulated workloads with no compliant path go to parinita.corridor.breach for Chrysalis logging and NOC escalation.
-
Chrysalis Audit
Every path selection decision, health event, and SLA breach anchored on Chrysalis for compliance reporting.
The Path-Scoring Engine
Corridor runs a per-site path-scoring engine fed by BFD probes (10ms x 5 multiplier) and active probes (100ms update interval) across every available path type at every POP. NATS JetStream events propagate health changes to the scorer in under 10ms.
The interface to Crucible is bidirectional. Corridor reads Crucible's identity-to-path mappings to know which paths each workload class may use. It publishes path-health events back to Crucible on parinita.corridor.health, which Crucible uses to update CRDT routing decisions.
Four scoring dimensions. Sub-50ms failover.
Corridor scores every path on four dimensions before selecting. HIPAA, ITAR, and Financial workloads disqualify public paths automatically. If no compliant path exists, the request is rejected — Corridor fails closed, not open.
- 01Latency ScoreWhat is the current measured latency on this path?
- 02Health ScoreWhat is the BFD probe health and active probe result for this path?
- 03Cost ScoreWhat is the relative cost of this path vs. alternatives?
- 04Sovereignty ConstraintDoes this path comply with the workload data-residency and circuit-type requirements?
- 05Carrier TypeIs this path private (Lumen/Megaport) or public? Does the workload class allow public paths?
- 06SLA ThresholdDoes this path meet the latency SLA for this workload class?
- 07Geographic AffinityWhich path routes closest to the destination jurisdiction?
- 08Failover AvailabilityIf the primary path degrades, is a compliant alternative path available?
import corridor
client = corridor.Client(seat_id='seat_8f3k2...', region='us-east')
path = client.select_path(workload_class='hipaa', origin='nyc-01', destination='lax-01')
print(path.carrier, path.latency_ms, path.sovereignty_compliant) Proven at scale. Not in a lab.
Parinita AI Edge is the production deployment of the Parinita platform and the largest heterogeneous AI infrastructure deployment in the United States.
Parinita AI Edge
The most complex heterogeneous AI infrastructure in the United States. 101 sites, 9 planes, 12,000+ nodes, 4 accelerator vendors, dual network fabrics, four-layer tenant isolation — all through a single sovereign control plane.
Network & Security Infrastructure
- Multi-vendor acceleratorsFour accelerator vendors — Intel Habana, NVIDIA, AMD, Qualcomm — orchestrated through one control plane with unified scheduling, monitoring, and lifecycle management.
- Dual-fabric networkingCisco production fabric and Arista GPU backend fabric operating as a coordinated system, bridged by identity-aware routing.
- Nationwide scale101 sites across 42 U.S. states, each operating autonomously with a local control agent and a sovereign cross-site routing plane.
- Multi-tenant isolationFour-layer defense-in-depth: VXLAN VNIs, identity-routing, Palo Alto firewalls, and Cilium eBPF — validated across every plane and site.
- Compliance readinessFIPS 140-2 at launch, with FedRAMP Moderate, CJIS, and IL4/IL5 certification paths active through Parinita compliance profiles.
- Sub-millisecond routingEvery request classified and dispatched in under 1ms, enabling real-time SLA enforcement without perceptible overhead.
Built for teams that run multi-jurisdiction AI workloads.
Corridor does not ask you to change your carriers, your Kubernetes distribution, or your compliance tooling. It enforces sovereignty at the path-selection layer.
You operate AI workloads across multiple jurisdictions where some flows can cross borders and others cannot. Corridor enforces that distinction at the network layer, not in application code.
-
Multi-Jurisdiction AI Workloads
Operating AI across jurisdictions where some flows can cross borders and others cannot. Corridor enforces that constraint at the path layer, not in application code.
-
Regulated Enterprise WAN
HIPAA, ITAR, and financial workloads needing a network layer that fails closed when no compliant path exists — not one that routes via public internet as a fallback.
-
BGP Replacement for AI Infrastructure
BGP convergence is too slow for AI inference SLAs. Corridor provides sub-50ms failover without requiring BGP reconfiguration.
-
Edge AI Fleet Management
Managing WAN connectivity across dozens or hundreds of edge locations with heterogeneous carrier availability. Corridor provides unified path management across all sites.
-
Mobile and Broadband Edge
iOS/Android apps and on-premises edge devices connecting to sovereign AI infrastructure. Corridor manages mobile/broadband carrier peering alongside enterprise WAN.
Deployment Models
Corridor deploys as part of the Parinita Opera stack. The path-scoring engine runs per-site and communicates health events via NATS JetStream to adjacent sites.
Per-site path-scoring engine with BFD/active probes across all available WAN paths | Best for: Single data center or edge site
Central Corridor control plane + per-site scoring engines with health-event propagation via NATS JetStream | Best for: Enterprise multi-site WAN
Nationwide | 101-site full mesh with sovereignty enforcement and SLA breach escalation | Best for: AI service providers and regulated enterprises
Request a Demo
Our engineering team has deployed Corridor across 101 sites managing sub-50ms failover across all major WAN providers. We bring that operational experience to every deployment conversation.